Questions about exams and assessment:
A) Documented confirmed illness;
B) Study trip confirmed by the rector’s order;
C) Fulfillment of obligations under public law, including judicial institutions;
D) Other honorable reasons (such as a car accident, domestic violence incident, etc.) that should be assessed individually by the dean and lecturer.
1. Correction of the thesis by referring to the lecturer: Assessment for the midterm and final exams may be appealed by the student within 48 hours of receiving the assessment information by student’s personal webpage or by submitting an appropriate written statement to the faculty learning process coordinator. The faculty is obliged to immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the student’s request, provide the student to see his/her work corrected by the lecturer, in case of disagreement with the midterm/final assessment. The student’s complaint will be forwarded to the lecturer for review within 24 hours of receiving the complaint. After receiving the complaint, the lecturer shall consider the complaint within 24 hours and make one of the following decisions by re-examining the test paper:
1) Not satisfy the complaint;
2) Satisfy the complaint completely (increase the assessment by the requested amount);
3) Satisfy the complaint partly (increase the assessment partly);
2. Review the appeal by the commission: If student disagrees with the decision made by correctional lecturer, he/she is entitled to write an appeal, within 24 hours of receipt of the appeal, the dean of the faculty shall form an appeals review committee composed of at least 3 members: one of them is a correctional lecturer, and the chair of the appeals commission may be: dean of the faculty, deputy dean, head of the educational program. The third member of the appeals commission must be a specialist in the profile in which the midterm/final evaluation is appealed. The appeals commission shall make one of the decisions given above by a majority of votes within 48 hours. No member of the commission have right to abstain from voting. The decision of the appeals commission is final and will not be appealed. The decision of the appeals commission shall be communicated to the student electronically through the student’s personal webpage, in case the student attends the appeals commission meeting, with the announcement at the appeals commission meeting. The announced decision will be reflected in the examination report.
The university has a unified assessment system what allows:
A) Five types of positive evaluation:
(A) Excellent – 91-100 points
(B) Very good – 81-90 points of maximum evaluation
(C) Good – 71-80 points of maximum evaluation
(D) Satisfactory – 61-70 points of maximum evaluation
(E) Sufficient – 51-60 points of maximum evaluation
B) Two types of evaluation:
(FX) Did not pass – 41-50 points of maximum evaluation, which means that the student needs to do more work and is given the right to take one more exam after an independent work;
(Failed) – less than 40 points of maximum evaluation, which means that the works conducted by a student is insufficient and he/she has to study the subject from beginning.
Questions about academic registration:
Head of study process management office
Tel: 597 540 096
Coordinator of the Educational Process Management Service of the Faculty of Law
Tel: 579 540 045
Coordinator of the Educational Process Management Service of the Faculty of Medicine
Tel: 574 540 092
Coordinator of the Educational Process Management Service of the Faculty of Humanities
Coordinator of the Educational Process Management Service of the Faculty of Economics, Business and Management
Tel: 574 100 005
The scholarship is awarded each academic semester based on the results of previous semester, based on selection. The selection is made by the faculty board, which results in the Rector’s order.
After submitting relevant documentation, socially vulnerable groups may receive an allowance in the form of a reduction in study fee, the amount of which in each individual case is determined individually by the Rector’s order.
In case the student fails to pay part of the study fee within 10 working days, the issue of step by step payment may be considered. For this purpose the student should apply to the Rector of Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University.
Questions about obtain/suspend/terminate status:
A) academic leave granted to the student on his/her own application for a maximum of 5 years; in case of continuing study abroad for the duration of study abroad(except for study under exchange educational program); study abroad should be documented, semester-long;
B) Compulsory military recruitment (confirmed by appropriate document);
C) In case of documented long illness;
D) Based on student application for pregnancy, childbirth and childcare;
E) In case of failure of administrative and/or academic registration for the relevant semester;
In case of violation of the terms/conditions of the agreement signed between the student and the Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University, including financial obligations (non-payment of study fees);
A) Completion of educational program at present stage;
B) personal statement;
C) Suspension of status for more than 5 years while studying at Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University;
D) Taking action incompatible with the status of a student under the rules of ethics and disciplinary responsibility provided by the Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University, followed by procedures established in accordance with internal law of the Tbilisi Humanitarian Teaching University to terminate a student’s status;
E) Death or declared dead by the court;
F) other grounds defined by the legislation of Georgia.
Student status is restored from the semester from which student status was suspended/terminated;
Restoration of student status on the basis of a personal application during the semester will be permitted if the student’s status is suspended, in case academic results can be achieved within the current semester.
Questions about mobility:
2. The student should take care of the material and technical values of the university, library funds, computers, etc.
3. Students are prohibited from:
A) Being in a sober state at the university;
B) use of toxic and narcotic substances.
4. The following actions will be considered a violation of student ethics by student:
A) Get into obscene verbal arguments with other students;
B) Initiating and/or engaging in physical conflicts with other students;
C) Use of obscene vocabulary on the official website of the university on social networks;
D) Use of the mobile phone for classes;
E) Behaviors in classroom that impede the study participants – lecturer, other students;
F) abuse of academic staff;
G) abuse of administrative staff;
H) abuse of support staff;
I) any other action that impedes the educational process, offends it or the image of the university;
J) violation of the tobacco restriction rule.
5. The student is prohibited from using others’ work, copying or dictating – in the process of testing knowledge. The work presented using these methods is not subject to evaluation.
A) warning (basic);
B) strict warning (basic);
C) Compensation for damage/loss (additional);
D) Last warning (basic –one academic semester – repeated violation, after warning or strict warning);
E) Termination of student status (expulsion from university) for a student – used in an extremely severe or gross violation when the student’s continued study at the university makes it impossible for others to protect their rights and safety and/or conduct the educational process.
2. There is a relevant sign at all entrances and other prominent places on the prohibition/restriction of tobacco smoking.